Originality and Craftsmanship
Spera Experience’s products are made in Italy with the specific purpose of maintaining a high-quality control on materials and semi-finished products. The aim is to provide an item that reflects, as much as possible, the characteristics declared, and the intent is to achieve this result with all the pieces that are produced.
For this reason, the speakers are supplied with the frequency and impedance responses measured on the individual specimen and compared with the reference responses within very tight tolerances. This is a service that is provided by very few manufacturers.
The final assembly and all checks are done by Roberto Spera himself, with the care and passion that a high-level craftsmanship deserves and that is necessarily needed to always offer a top-quality product.
Spera Experience proposal
The Spera Experience is not an industrial concern whose items you can find in stores. Ours is an artisanal proposal that stands out, as types of proposals, from most similar products. What I submit to the enthusiast is my vision of listening, that is a way of listening to music in which the balance between the various components is the primary purpose to be achieved.
In my life, as an enthusiast, I have listened to a lot of systems and components, some with outstanding features on certain parameters but, at the end, there was always something disappointing. At first, I could not figure out what it was, but then it turned out that what fulfills listening is the overall balance. A system to gratify and please the listening must have all the requirements at the same time at a very high level, without anyone taking over the others.
Obviously, not being available in stores, we have set up a showroom committed exclusively to listening to our proposals. Here you are welcome, and, by appointment, you can listen to your own amplifier (perhaps tube) connected to our speakers, etc.
A processed and controlled environment in which every sound specificity will be evident, so that you can make an informed choice and be aware of the effectiveness of our suggestion, which, of course, you may or may not like, but I’m confident that you cannot say that it is not of quality.
Some will ask how much this quality costs. Our business philosophy is not based, as some do, on inflating prices and the giving large discounts to appear generous. Instead, it assumes that, precisely because we are not in stores, and therefore sell directly, our prices are cheaper. They are theresult of the cost of the materials, and related workmanship, and the fair mark-up for the manufacturer (i.e., the one who’s writing you). You have an approximate savings of 40 to 50 percent compared to the same items, if they were on a store shelf.
Of course, our products are high-quality and made-to-order, so our prices may not be the same as online sales, to be clear, and there are no discounts foreseen. I am aware that in today’s world this attitude may seem outdated, but we want to apply a clear and transparent business policy, and our purpose is to keep the price as low as possible without lowering the quality of our products.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b79f/1b79f94b353a7e1cfbddd6a8a414c3d3d91e3ced" alt="Delirium - Retro Delirium - Retro"
SOUND REPRODUCTION IN THE ENVIRONMENT
Here you have just some general information in order to not weigh down the topic. Details will be given to whoever wants to know more about our products. While looking for the best quality ever, this is a very difficult subject.
Sure, but how is it possible to establish and quantify the quality of a sound and of the system which generates it?
Pursuit of the best quality
Our purpose is to reproduce the signal recorded in the medium (compact disc, vinyl, liquid music, etc.) as faithfully as possible.
It concerns us that our sound-reproduction system reproduces it as faithfully as possible, or rather, that the sound of the recording reaches our ear as faithfully as possible.
And here, there is a lot to be said!!
It is important to understand that we have to deal with many effects of physics, acoustics and electroacoustics (and these are only the most important) before the sound reaches our ears.
Attention, we don’t want to alarm you, but until you don’t understand our vision, you won’t understand why we chose specific projects instead of others.
To better understand, you can try a simple experiment: you just need a stereo system and headphones. It’s sure that you noticed the big difference between hearing with and without headphones.
Let’s leave aside the other aspects of reproduction (still important) for a moment and let’s focus on the details of ambient reflections and instrument harmonics: it is easy to realize how often they are different.
This happens for two main reasons: the first reason is the technology of the transduction system, and the second reason is the way the speaker is emitted into the room and the room itself.
The importance of the reproduction environment
The element with the greatest influence on the ultimate result is, and not only in my opinion, the relationship between the most critical transducer in a reproduction system (i.e., the loudspeaker) and the room in which it operates.
It is very important not only how the loudspeaker is designed and manufactured, but its design should foresee how its emission will react with the environment and what measures should then be put in place so that the environment will affect the emission of the loudspeaker as little as possible (which should reflect, as mentioned above, as closely as possible the signal sent to its terminals).
My experience leads me to say that if we want to get the best performance out of any system (even an inexpensive one), the acoustic treatment of the listening room is fundamental.
Sure enough, it is obvious that if we overlay the reflections of the recording with the reflections of the environment, the result can be either underwhelming or agreeable, and yet it will not be the best that can be obtained from that system in that environment.
Some may say that nullifying room reflections is equivalent to making an anechoic room. It goes without saying that this is not what needs to be done. Decades of experience of many audio and room acoustics experts lead me to say that the target is to cancel or greatly reduce the deleterious effect of the first room reflections that, by creating virtual sources within milliseconds, mix with the direct sound by “fouling” it (do you remember this term?), often in a way that cannot be corrected by any other method but proper room treatment.
You may have noticed that there are many items on the market that boast of effectively correcting the room, and at a limited cost. It grieves me to tell you that making a truly effective listening environment is a kind of art that not many know how to master. Indeed, as you can see from the pictures, the Spera Experience showroom is quite unique in this regard.
Certainly, another key element is the relationship between the amplifier and the speaker. Although, as specified in the dedicated section (speaker technique), it is not always said that it is the amplifier that has to fit the speaker, but sometimes the opposite is true.
Therefore, concretely, one must first research what the sound masking elements are, and then apply existing and enforceable countermeasures. To summarize, it could be said that once the loudspeaker has been designed and built, the room will have to be treated appropriately and the most suitable amplifier will have to be sought also, and especially, as electrical synergy.
We have, therefore, mentioned those that, in my view, are the three most important and relevant elements for having a high-quality sound.
Other masking effects
The next step is about the multitude of other masking features. It would take too long to enumerate all of them here, but those who wants to, can deepen them with the undersigned.
However, it is a must to talk about the most important one, which is the fight against vibration. This topic is transversal in the audio area, in fact it regards all the devices designed for sound reproduction.
As you can easily perceive, the greater the intensity of vibration, the greater its deleterious effect. Consequently, it is easy to understand why I have devoted a lot of energy, including design energy, in trying to decrease vibration in speakers, which generate a lot of it because of their functioning.
We have a negative effect when the materials that are in direct contact, or that are subjected to the vibration of the speakers, also vibrate, creating a background of unwanted “voices” that “foul” the sound in a way that is not easily identifiable. Indeed, we only become aware of it, when some serious vibration-fighting modes are applied..
There are not many companies that are seriously taking care of this issue. In fact, in advertising, there is often talk about elastic decoupling of loudspeakers, for example, but my experience has taught me that such a technique, to be effective, has to shift the resonant frequency of the object plus decoupling system assembly to very low frequencies, and this creates issues that are not so easy to solve.
Indeed, cheap and simple techniques do not work efficiently. Therefore, a complex system is used in my speakers (as you can see from the photos and data sheets), which may discourage some people and seem exaggerated to others, but I assure you that the technique I have applied is effective and greatly reduces the deleterious effect of at least some types of vibration.
Fight against vibration
Another significant aspect that has been applied in the speaker is the fight to the vibration transmitted from the woofer to the other components, especially the tweeter, as mentioned in the section about the design philosophy.
The vibration between the loudspeakers in the same system causes severe intermodulation distortion, which, too often, is underestimated by manufacturers. In order to be solved effectively, in fact, it requires interventions that are too impactful on industrial-level simplicity of construction, and thus on cost.
This is another reason why I believe that appealing to small, artisanal manufacturers allows enthusiasts to have access to special and very effective techniques and, often, at a competitive price.
In particular, in the Delirium system, some peculiar but effective techniques based on rubber bands have been applied in this regard. There genuinely allow you to have a sound cleanliness of the superior mid-high range that is easily guessed even by just touching the tweeter flange with the speaker running: no vibration will be detected.
Applying such technique was not easy. Indeed, it was necessary to make aluminum supports of adequate strength and that would allow the appropriate resonance frequency (to be effective) of the elastic system to be reached.
This technique turned out to be so successful that it was also applied to the cross-over filter header and, even, to the two most critical components: the coil in series with the woofer and the capacitor in series with the tweeter, making it (along with its other special features) as the extreme of the two-way speaker.
The other speaker, Deep Harmony, takes advantage of the experience gained on the Delirium system but applied in most basic and less extreme ways in order to limit the costs, whereas, in other respects as well, this system is cheaper than the other.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/845ee/845ee6e5f090c6b20ff092f1ffc4f55bd09fb44e" alt="Spera Experience - ShowRoom Spera Experience - ShowRoom"
SPEAKER TECHNOLOGY
Why the impedance compensation?
As you may have noticed, all Spera Experience’s proposed speakers have either insertable impedance compensation (as on the Deep Harmony model) or fixed impedance compensation (as on the Delirium model).
The original choice to apply impedance compensation (given the paucity of commercial speakers using it) comes from a simple argument proven by various experiments and shared by other experts in the field.
Among enthusiasts, and among audio professionals, one often hears that tube amplifications have a sound characterized by poor damping and poor low frequencies, a nice but prominent midrange, and an underwhelming and somewhat light high range.
Since it is my habit to delve into the topics that catch my attention, I went to check the situation, not only from the technical side of tube amplifications but also from the side of the interactions between the amplifier and the speaker.
The tube amplifications so beloved by enthusiasts have obvious limitations (in theory at least) due to the technology itself. The most important ones are: tubes are voltage-amplifying devices and therefore not suitable for driving difficult loads (read low impedances that require high values of current delivered as the load given by the speaker decreases) and poor internal damping due to the presence of the output transformer, which results in poor control of the movement of the woofer cone at low frequencies and in the fact that the frequency response is affected by the impedance curve, that is: if the impedance increases, proportionally increases the level of the response.
By reading industry magazines, I have noticed that almost all speakers on the market, nowadays, have an impedance of about 4 ohms nominal, perhaps because they sound a little louder connected to transistor amps (which are the most popular in the low and medium price categories), but this results in an unfortunate coupling with valve amplifiers for the reasons described here.
This situation is easily verified by checking the limit load curves published in the technical trials of the most reliable journals in this respect, which highlights the effort of valve designers to ensure that their amplifiers can drive loads that often reach 3 ohms or less.
Only the more expensive or better designed ones can do it, but all of them, in order to do so, give in to the power delivered, that is to ensure that the amplifier does not give in heavily in pilotage, you necessarily give up the power supplied.
In a nutshell, if you have a 4 ohms nominal speaker and you buy a 25 Watts tube, for example, you will hardly get more than half and with the amplifier always working close to its driving limit, that is without dynamic reserve.
On the other hand, if one looks at the same load-boundary curve between 8 and 16 ohms, one realizes that all tubes (even the cheapest ones) manage to almost double their power, going from 16 to 8 ohms, which means that on such loads they have no dynamics problem.
It will be objected that on 16 ohms the amplifiers give half nominal power. Referring to my personal experience, I assure you that it is much more rewarding to listen at a slightly lower level but without dynamic limitations than the opposite.
The second aspect, perhaps even more important, is the one of the compensations of this impedance. In this regard I enclose three charts I made on the Deep Harmony loudspeaker, which show unequivocally what an enormous difference there is in total frequency response in the room.
There is a huge difference in total in-room frequency response of this speaker connected to an average tube amplifier.
The highest curve in Chart 1 refers to non-compensated impedance (i.e., the one in Chart 2), the lowest curve refers to compensated impedance (i.e., the one in Chart 3).
As you may notice, the difference is obvious. At many points, this difference reaches 5/6 decibels (remember that a difference of 3 decibels is half the power), which means that at those points it is as if the amplifier is delivering almost four times more power. It becomes clear that such a result cannot be considered high-fidelity. The differences are too marked, completely altering the timbre of the system and that, in my opinion, is unacceptable.
There is a huge difference in total in-room frequency response of this speaker connected to an average tube amplifier.
The highest curve in Chart 1 refers to non-compensated impedance (i.e., the one in Chart 2), the lowest curve refers to compensated impedance (i.e., the one in Chart 3).
As you may notice, the difference is obvious. At many points, this difference reaches 5/6 decibels (remember that a difference of 3 decibels is half the power), which means that at those points it is as if the amplifier is delivering almost four times more power. It becomes clear that such a result cannot be considered high-fidelity. The differences are too marked, completely altering the timbre of the system and that, in my opinion, is unacceptable.
I point out that even at low frequencies the compensation of the second peak of the reflex chord (the most important and obvious one) simplifies the functioning of the amplifier, which, basically, must deal with zero electrical phase rotation.
In other terms, the speaker thus developed, with high impedance (in this case about 13 ohms) and compensated, will not distort the timbre of the system but will allow the tube amplifier to never struggle while driving, to express its timbre with accuracy and to follow the dynamic excursions of the music without limitation other than reaching its maximum power.
I point out that even at low frequencies the compensation of the second peak of the reflex chord (the most important and obvious one) simplifies the functioning of the amplifier, which, basically, must deal with zero electrical phase rotation.
In other terms, the speaker thus developed, with high impedance (in this case about 13 ohms) and compensated, will not distort the timbre of the system but will allow the tube amplifier to never struggle while driving, to express its timbre with accuracy and to follow the dynamic excursions of the music without limitation other than reaching its maximum power.
I point out that the Spera Experience speakers are not designed specifically for tube amplifiers, but to make them easy to drive by any amplifier. The purpose is to make such an assembled system without dynamic problems. I consider a speaker that is hard to drive a serious design mistake.
Later, this feature was tested on transistor amplifiers as well, finding out that they (although to a lesser extent) benefit from high compensated impedance too, especially those without feedback that are so much in vogue nowadays, whose damping factor is less than those counter reacted.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/429bc/429bcbc0c9fad3556b3eb09930f73ca3b03129b4" alt="Spera Experience - Logo Spera Experience - Logo"
I point out that the Spera Experience speakers are not designed specifically for tube amplifiers, but to make them easy to drive by any amplifier. The purpose is to make such an assembled system without dynamic problems. I consider a speaker that is hard to drive a serious design mistake.
Later, this feature was tested on transistor amplifiers as well, finding out that they (although to a lesser extent) benefit from high compensated impedance too, especially those without feedback that are so much in vogue nowadays, whose damping factor is less than those counter reacted.
Come visit us
We have a showroom entirely committed to the display of our products, in which you are welcome, and where, by appointment, you can also test your own amplifier. A processed and controlled environment in which every sound specificity will be evident, so that you can make an informed choice and be aware of the effectiveness of our suggestion.